When Signals Stop Making Sense

Why scanning systems struggle when meaning changes faster than our categories can adapt

Conceptual essay

Jen Stumbles

horizon scanning

weak signals

sensemaking

grounded theory

intelligence tradecraft

AI-assisted research

futures intelligence

About this Drop

A conceptual essay on why horizon scanning systems struggle when the meaning of a signal shifts faster than the categories built to hold it. This Drop gathers the essay with the sources it leans on, the passages where it leans on them, the cover asset and a first sketch of how the ideas connect.

Drop contents

00

Open

Essay

Own page · 7 Sep 2026

01

Present

Source library

13 · links

02

Absent

Data

No dataset

03

Absent

Signals of change

No scan hits here

04

Present

Assets

1 · cover image

05

Sketch

Idea map

The thinking

06

Soon

AI declaration

Not yet

Where the essay leans

Passages where the argument draws on other people’s work.

Passage

the contextual and relational character of weak signals

Ahlqvist & Uotila, 2020

Passage

persistent gaps in the traceability of scenario construction

Kosow, 2015 · Weidenfeld et al., 2026

Passage

the limitations of reductionist and extrapolative approaches to emergence

Kerbel, 2019

Passage

Lateral range does not, by itself, secure epistemic adequacy.

Indy Johar

Source library

Links and references, not the knowledge itself.

#

Role

Source

Year

Quoted or cited

Used as the argument goes

02

Cited

Ahlqvist & Uotila

Contextualising weak signals: Towards a relational theory of futures knowledge

Futures, 119

2020

03

Cited

Kerbel, J.

Coming to Terms with Anticipatory Intelligence

War on the Rocks, 13 Aug 2019

2019

05

Cited

Kosow, H.

New outlooks in traceability and consistency of integrated scenarios

European Journal of Futures Research, 3(16)

2015

12

Cited

Weidenfeld, Barbier, Fernandez & Payraudeau

From statements to model input data: Traceability and consistency of qualitative and quantitative scenarios in a participatory foresight exercise

Futures, 184

2026

13

Quoted

Johar, I.

Don’t become a generalist. Become recursive.

[publication to add]

[year to add]

Reference list

Listed at the end, not cited in the body

01

Listed

Ahlqvist, T.

Future uncertainties, emergence and context: On interface of strategic foresight and intelligence studies

Centrum Balticum, 22 Jan 2026

2026

04

Listed

Kosow, H.

Consistent context scenarios: A new approach to story and simulation

Fourth International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis

2011

06

Listed

Kuusi, Cuhls & Steinmüller

The futures Map and its quality criteria

European Journal of Futures Research, 3(22)

2015

07

Listed

Miller, R.

Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method

Futures, 39(4)

2007

08

Listed

Office of the Director of National Intelligence

Intelligence Community Directive 203: Analytic standards

ODNI, 2 Jan 2015

2015

09

Listed

Centre for Strategic Futures

Our Approach

Centre for Strategic Futures, Singapore, 29 Jul 2026

2026

10

Listed

Parson, E. A.

Useful global-change scenarios: Current issues and challenges

Environmental Research Letters, 3(4)

2008

11

Listed

Popper, R.

How are foresight methods selected?

Foresight, 10(6)

2008

Three earlier posts by the author are referenced in the essay. The split between cited and listed is a first reading, to confirm.

Assets

Cover image

AI-generated image

Midjourney v8.2, as captioned in the post

Prompt: [to add, or marked as withheld]

Overview

What is in this Drop.

Form

Conceptual essay

Published

7 Sept 2026

Sources

13

Quoted or cited

5

Version

0.1 draft

Resources

Earlier posts · 3 referenced in the essay

Cite this Drop

Stumbles, J. (2026, September 7). When Signals Stop Making Sense [Drop, v0.1 draft].